QIQTH.Fock.WienerL2
← all sections · ← WedgeAnalyticity · GaussianMode →
Fock · entries 384–427 of 1000
Definition 384 (schwartzTranslate). source ↗
Wiener brick 1 — the Schwartz translation operator τ_a : 𝓢(ℝ,ℂ) →L[ℂ] 𝓢(ℝ,ℂ), f ↦ f(·+a). Built via SchwartzMap.compCLM with the temperate-growth affine map x ↦ x + a (HasTemperateGrowth.id' + .const, and the moderate-decay bound ‖x‖ ≤ (1+‖a‖)(1+‖x+a‖)). The foundational operator for the L²-translate↔modulation intertwining 𝓕 ∘ τ_a = M_a ∘ 𝓕 behind Wiener’s L² Tauberian theorem.
Used by schwartzTranslate_apply, boostUnitary_toLp, fourier_schwartzTranslate, fourierL2_boostUnitary.
Lemma 385 (schwartzTranslate_apply). source ↗
Proof. Immediate from the definitions.
Used by boostUnitary_toLp, fourier_schwartzTranslate.
Lemma 386 (boostUnitary_toLp). source ↗
Wiener brick 3 — the boost unitary IS the Schwartz translation, at L²: boostUnitary a (f.toLp) = (schwartzTranslate (−a) f).toLp (both =ᵐ θ ↦ f(θ−a), via coeFn_boostUnitary, the measure-preserving translated-ae, and schwartzTranslate_apply). This connects the QIQT rapidity-boost group to the generic Schwartz translation, so the Schwartz-level Fourier translate→modulation lemma transfers to boostUnitary (the next brick toward the intertwining 𝓕 ∘ boostUnitary_a = M_a ∘ 𝓕).
Proof. By coeFn_boostUnitary, schwartzTranslate_apply.
Used by fourierL2_boostUnitary.
Definition 387 (modChar). source ↗
The unit Fourier character ξ ↦ e^{i c ξ} (modulus 1).
Used by norm_modChar, continuous_modChar, memLp_modChar_smul, modL2, coeFn_modL2, norm_modL2, fourier_schwartzTranslate, modL2_sub, and 4 more.
Lemma 388 (norm_modChar). source ↗
Proof. Immediate from the definitions.
Used by memLp_modChar_smul, norm_modL2.
Lemma 389 (continuous_modChar). source ↗
Proof. Immediate from the definitions.
Used by memLp_modChar_smul.
Lemma 390 (memLp_modChar_smul). source ↗
e^{icξ}·g ∈ L² whenever g ∈ L² (modulus-1 multiplier, via MemLp.of_le_mul).
Proof. By norm_modChar, continuous_modChar.
Used by modL2, coeFn_modL2.
Definition 391 (modL2). source ↗
Wiener brick 2 — the L² modulation operator M_c : g ↦ (ξ ↦ e^{icξ} g(ξ)).
Used by coeFn_modL2, norm_modL2, modL2_sub, isometry_modL2, continuous_modL2, fourierL2_boostUnitary, inner_boostUnitary_eq_integral.
Lemma 392 (coeFn_modL2). source ↗
Proof. By memLp_modChar_smul.
Used by norm_modL2, modL2_sub, fourierL2_boostUnitary, inner_boostUnitary_eq_integral.
Lemma 393 (norm_modL2). source ↗
M_c is an L²-isometry: ‖M_c g‖ = ‖g‖ (the character has modulus 1).
Proof. By modChar, norm_modChar, coeFn_modL2.
Used by isometry_modL2.
Lemma 394 (fourier_schwartzTranslate). source ↗
Wiener brick 4a — the Schwartz translate→modulation identity (pointwise). 𝓕(f(·−a))(w) = e^{−2πi a w} · 𝓕f(w) — the Fourier dual of translation is modulation by the unit character modChar (−2πa). Via fourier_coe (Schwartz 𝓕 = integral 𝓕 on the coeFn) and VectorFourier.fourierIntegral_comp_add_right.
Proof. By schwartzTranslate_apply.
Used by fourierL2_boostUnitary.
Lemma 395 (modL2_sub). source ↗
M_c is subtractive (companion to modL2_add), giving the isometry below.
Proof. By modChar, coeFn_modL2.
Used by isometry_modL2.
Lemma 396 (isometry_modL2). source ↗
M_c is an isometry of L² (modulus-1 multiplier), hence continuous.
Proof. By norm_modL2, modL2_sub.
Used by continuous_modL2.
Lemma 397 (continuous_modL2). source ↗
Proof. By isometry_modL2.
Used by fourierL2_boostUnitary.
Lemma 398 (fourierL2_boostUnitary). source ↗
Wiener brick 4b — the L² translate→modulation intertwining. 𝓕 (boostUnitary a g) = M_{−2πa} (𝓕 g) for all g ∈ L² — the boost (a translation) becomes multiplication by the unit character under the L² Fourier unitary. Proven on the dense Schwartz range (brick 4a + toLp_fourier_eq + boostUnitary_toLp) and extended by DenseRange.equalizer (both sides continuous: 𝓕/boostUnitary are isometry-equivs, M_c is continuous_modL2).
Proof. By schwartzTranslate, boostUnitary_toLp, modChar, coeFn_modL2, fourier_schwartzTranslate, continuous_modL2.
Used by inner_boostUnitary_eq_integral.
Lemma 399 (conj_modChar). source ↗
The unit character conjugates to its inverse: conj (e^{icξ}) = e^{−icξ}.
Proof. Immediate from the definitions.
Used by inner_boostUnitary_eq_integral.
Lemma 400 (inner_boostUnitary_eq_integral). source ↗
Wiener brick 5 — the bridge. Via Plancherel (inner_fourier_eq) and the intertwining (brick 4), the boost-orbit inner product is the integral (inverse) Fourier transform of k(ξ) = conj(𝓕g₀ ξ)·𝓕h ξ ∈ L¹: ⟪boostUnitary a g₀, h⟫ = ∫ e^{+2πi a ξ}·conj(𝓕g₀ ξ)·𝓕h ξ dξ. So the orbit-orthogonality condition ∀a, ⟪…⟫ = 0 becomes the vanishing of the FT of k — the exact hypothesis of the L¹ uniqueness theorem (next brick).
Proof. By modL2, coeFn_modL2, fourierL2_boostUnitary, conj_modChar.
Used by fourier_correlation_eq.
Lemma 401 (fourier_correlation_eq). source ↗
Wiener brick 6a — the reduction. The function Fourier transform of k(ξ) = conj(𝓕g₀ ξ)·𝓕h ξ at w equals the boost-orbit correlation ⟪boostUnitary (−w) g₀, h⟫ (brick 5 at a = −w, matching the 𝓕-character 𝐞(−⟪ξ,w⟫) = modChar(2π(−w))ξ). Hence (∀a, ⟪boost_a g₀,h⟫ = 0) ⟹ 𝓕 k ≡ 0.
Proof. By modChar, inner_boostUnitary_eq_integral.
Used by boost_orbit_total_of_fourier_ne_zero.
Lemma 402 (ae_eq_zero_of_fourier_eq_zero). source ↗
Wiener brick 6b — Fourier injectivity on L¹. If k ∈ L¹(ℝ) and its (function) Fourier transform vanishes identically, then k = 0 a.e. Proof: it suffices (AEEqOfIntegralContDiff) that ∫ g·k = 0 for every real smooth compactly-supported test g; package its complexification G:=↑∘g as a Schwartz map, write G = 𝓕(𝓕⁻G) (Schwartz inversion) and apply the multiplication formula ∫ 𝓕(𝓕⁻G)·k = ∫ (𝓕⁻G)·𝓕k (integral_fourierIntegral_smul_eq_flip, innerₗ symmetric) = 0 since 𝓕 k = 0.
Proof. Immediate from the definitions.
Used by boost_orbit_total_of_fourier_ne_zero, fourierL2_toLp_ne_zero_of_ne_zero.
Lemma 403 (boost_orbit_total_of_fourier_ne_zero). source ↗
Wiener brick 7 — the Tauberian conclusion. If 𝓕 g₀ ≠ 0 a.e. and h is orthogonal to the entire boost orbit of g₀, then h = 0. Chains 6a (orbit-orthogonality ⟹ 𝓕 k ≡ 0, k=conj(𝓕g₀)·𝓕h ∈ L¹) with 6b (𝓕 k = 0 ⟹ k=ᵐ0); then 𝓕g₀≠0 a.e. forces 𝓕 h = 0 a.e. ⟹ 𝓕 h = 0 ⟹ h = 0 (𝓕 an isometry).
Proof. By fourier_correlation_eq, ae_eq_zero_of_fourier_eq_zero.
Used by niceWedgeCyclic_of_fourier_ne_zero.
Lemma 404 (ae_ne_zero_of_analyticOnNhd). source ↗
Wiener brick 8c — a nonzero real-analytic function is ≠ 0 a.e. The zero set of a function analytic on all of ℝ (and not identically zero) is co-discrete, hence Lebesgue-null (AnalyticOnNhd.eqOn_zero_or_eventually_ne_zero_of_preconnected + ae_restrict_le_codiscreteWithin). This is the final step turning “the boost-orbit generator’s Fourier transform is entire and ≢ 0” into the Wiener hypothesis 𝓕 g₀ ≠ 0 a.e. of brick 7.
Proof. Immediate from the definitions.
Used by fourierL2_toLp_ne_zero_of_ne_zero.
Lemma 405 (integrable_exp_neg_mul_abs). source ↗
Wiener brick 8a-foundation — exp(−b|x|) is integrable on ℝ for b > 0. The reusable both-ends exponential building block: f =O[atBot] exp(b·) and f =O[atTop] exp(−b·), each integrable at its end (exp_neg_integrableOn_Ioi + reflection), via LocallyIntegrable.integrable_of_isBigO_atBot_atTop. Dominates the 1/cosh²θ decay of Krep, giving Krep ∈ L¹ and its finite exponential moments.
Proof. Immediate from the definitions.
Used by integrable_abs_mul_exp_neg_mul_abs, integrable_Krep, integrable_ftKrep.
Lemma 406 (integrable_abs_mul_exp_neg_mul_abs). source ↗
|θ|·exp(−d|θ|) is integrable on ℝ for d > 0 — the derivative-domination building block for the FT-holomorphy (8b): |θ| ≤ (2/d)·exp((d/2)|θ|) (from t ≤ exp t) absorbs the |θ| into a slower exponential dominated by integrable_exp_neg_mul_abs (d/2).
Proof. By integrable_exp_neg_mul_abs.
Used by hasDerivAt_ftKrepF.
Lemma 407 (inv_cosh_sq_le_exp). source ↗
(cosh θ)⁻² ≤ 4·exp(−2|θ|) — from exp|θ| ≤ 2cosh θ (one of e^{±θ} equals e^{|θ|}).
Proof. Immediate from the definitions.
Used by integrable_Krep, norm_Krep_le_exp.
Lemma 408 (integrable_Krep). source ↗
Wiener brick 8a — Krep m f ∈ L¹(ℝ) for a Schwartz test f: the localized rapidity amplitude is integrable, since ‖Krep m f θ‖ ≤ C·(cosh θ)⁻² (schwartz_Krep_decay_sq) ≤ 4C·exp(−2|θ|), dominated by the integrable exp(−2|θ|) (integrable_exp_neg_mul_abs). Makes the function Fourier transform of Krep well-defined and is the base for the L²↔L¹ agreement and the FT-holomorphy (8b).
Proof. By Krep_continuous, schwartz_Krep_decay_sq, integrable_exp_neg_mul_abs, inv_cosh_sq_le_exp.
Used by fourierL2_Krep_ne_zero.
Definition 409 (ftKrep). source ↗
The complexified Fourier integrand exp(−2π i θ ζ)·Krep(θ).
Used by ftKrepF, hasDerivAt_ftKrep, norm_ftKrep, continuous_ftKrep, integrable_ftKrep, hasDerivAt_ftKrepF, ftKrepF_eq_fourier.
Definition 410 (ftKrep'). source ↗
Its ζ-derivative −2π i θ exp(−2π i θ ζ)·Krep(θ).
Used by hasDerivAt_ftKrep, norm_ftKrep', continuous_ftKrep', hasDerivAt_ftKrepF, analyticOnNhd_ftKrepF_real.
Definition 411 (ftKrepF). source ↗
The complexified Fourier transform F(ζ) = ∫ exp(−2π i θ ζ)·Krep(θ) dθ.
Used by hasDerivAt_ftKrepF, analyticOnNhd_ftKrepF_real, ftKrepF_eq_fourier, analyticOnNhd_fourier_Krep.
Lemma 412 (hasDerivAt_ftKrep). source ↗
The integrand is ζ-holomorphic pointwise, with derivative ftKrep'.
Proof. By Krep.
Used by hasDerivAt_ftKrepF.
Lemma 413 (ftKrep_exp_re). source ↗
The exponent’s real part: Re(−2π i θ ζ) = 2π θ (Im ζ).
Proof. Immediate from the definitions.
Used by norm_ftKrep', norm_ftKrep.
Lemma 414 (norm_ftKrep'). source ↗
The norm of the integrand’s ζ-derivative.
Proof. By ftKrep_exp_re.
Used by hasDerivAt_ftKrepF.
Lemma 415 (norm_ftKrep). source ↗
The norm of the integrand itself.
Proof. By ftKrep_exp_re.
Used by integrable_ftKrep.
Lemma 416 (norm_Krep_le_exp). source ↗
The decay constant for Krep, factored: ‖Krep m f θ‖ ≤ C·exp(−2|θ|) for some C ≥ 0.
Proof. By schwartz_Krep_decay_sq, inv_cosh_sq_le_exp.
Used by integrable_ftKrep, hasDerivAt_ftKrepF.
Lemma 417 (continuous_ftKrep). source ↗
Proof. Immediate from the definitions.
Used by integrable_ftKrep, hasDerivAt_ftKrepF.
Lemma 418 (continuous_ftKrep'). source ↗
Proof. Immediate from the definitions.
Used by hasDerivAt_ftKrepF.
Lemma 419 (integrable_ftKrep). source ↗
The integrand is integrable at any strip point |Im ζ| < 1/π.
Proof. By Krep, Krep_continuous, integrable_exp_neg_mul_abs, norm_ftKrep, norm_Krep_le_exp, continuous_ftKrep.
Used by hasDerivAt_ftKrepF.
Lemma 420 (hasDerivAt_ftKrepF). source ↗
Wiener brick 8b — the FT of Krep is holomorphic on the strip. At every ζ₀ with |Im ζ₀| < 1/π, F(ζ) = ∫ exp(−2π i θ ζ)·Krep(θ) dθ is complex-differentiable, with derivative ∫ ftKrep'. Via the dominated-derivative theorem (hasDerivAt_integral_of_dominated_loc_of_deriv_le, 𝕜 = ℂ): the integrand is pointwise ζ-holomorphic (hasDerivAt_ftKrep), L¹ at ζ₀ (integrable_ftKrep), and its derivative is dominated on a ball by 2πC·|θ|·exp(−d|θ|) ∈ L¹ (integrable_abs_mul_exp_neg_mul_abs).
Proof. By Krep, Krep_continuous, integrable_abs_mul_exp_neg_mul_abs, ftKrep, hasDerivAt_ftKrep, norm_ftKrep', norm_Krep_le_exp, continuous_ftKrep, continuous_ftKrep', integrable_ftKrep.
Used by analyticOnNhd_ftKrepF_real.
Lemma 421 (analyticOnNhd_ftKrepF_real). source ↗
Wiener brick 8b-fin — the FT of Krep, on ℝ, is real-analytic. F is holomorphic on the open strip |Im ζ| < 1/π (brick 8b), which contains ℝ; restricting to the real axis gives AnalyticOnNhd ℝ (ξ ↦ F ξ) univ (the same DifferentiableOn.analyticOnNhd + restrictScalars/ofRealCLM route as 8c′). Feeds brick 8c: combined with ≢ 0 it yields F ≠ 0 a.e. on ℝ.
Proof. By ftKrep', hasDerivAt_ftKrepF.
Used by analyticOnNhd_fourier_Krep.
Lemma 422 (ftKrepF_eq_fourier). source ↗
Wiener brick 8b-bridge (function FT) — F restricts to the function Fourier transform of Krep. ftKrepF m f ξ = 𝓕(Krep m f) ξ for real ξ (matching the character exp(−2πiθξ) = 𝐞(−⟨θ,ξ⟩), Real.fourier_eq/Real.fourierChar_apply). With analyticOnNhd_ftKrepF_real this gives AnalyticOnNhd ℝ (𝓕 Krep) univ.
Proof. By ftKrep.
Used by analyticOnNhd_fourier_Krep.
Lemma 423 (analyticOnNhd_fourier_Krep). source ↗
The function Fourier transform of Krep is real-analytic on ℝ (combining ftKrepF_eq_fourier with analyticOnNhd_ftKrepF_real). Combined with ≢ 0, brick 8c yields 𝓕(Krep) ≠ 0 a.e.
Proof. By ftKrepF, analyticOnNhd_ftKrepF_real, ftKrepF_eq_fourier.
Used by fourierL2_Krep_ne_zero.
Lemma 424 (integral_smul_fourierL2_eq). source ↗
The integral pairing identity. For g ∈ L¹∩L² and Schwartz φ: ∫ φ·⇑(𝓕_{L²}(g.toLp)) = ∫ φ·𝓕_{int}(g) — via the tempered-distribution Fourier transform (fourier_toTemperedDistribution_eq + fourier_apply + the Lp pairing toTemperedDistribution_apply) and the multiplication formula (integral_fourierIntegral_smul_eq_flip).
Proof. Immediate from the definitions.
Used by fourierL2_toLp_ae_eq.
Lemma 425 (fourierL2_toLp_ae_eq). source ↗
Wiener brick 8b-bridge (L²↔L¹) — the L² FT coeFn agrees a.e. with the function FT. For g ∈ L¹∩L², ⇑(𝓕_{L²}(g.toLp)) =ᵐ 𝓕_{int}(g). From the pairing identity integral_smul_fourierL2_eq (both pair equally with every Schwartz φ) + the variational lemma ae_eq_of_integral_contDiff_smul_eq (testing against real C^∞_c functions, packaged as Schwartz).
Proof. By integral_smul_fourierL2_eq.
Used by fourierL2_toLp_ne_zero_of_ne_zero.
Lemma 426 (fourierL2_toLp_ne_zero_of_ne_zero). source ↗
The Wiener nonvanishing, assembled. For g ∈ L¹∩L² with 𝓕 g real-analytic on ℝ and g ≢ 0, the L² FT coeFn ⇑(𝓕_{L²}(g.toLp)) ≠ 0 a.e. Chains: g ≢ 0 ⟹ ∃ x, 𝓕g(x)≠0 (brick 6b contrapositive) ⟹ 𝓕 g ≠ 0 a.e. (brick 8c) ⟹ (L²↔L¹ agreement) ⇑(𝓕_{L²}(g.toLp)) ≠ 0 a.e.
Proof. By ae_eq_zero_of_fourier_eq_zero, ae_ne_zero_of_analyticOnNhd, fourierL2_toLp_ae_eq.
Used by fourierL2_Krep_ne_zero.
Lemma 427 (fourierL2_Krep_ne_zero). source ↗
The Wiener nonvanishing for Krep. If the localized amplitude Krep m fS of a Schwartz wedge test fS is not a.e. zero, then the L² Fourier transform of its one-particle vector is ≠ 0 a.e. — the Wiener hypothesis of brick 7, ready to feed niceWedgeCyclic_of_fourier_ne_zero.
Proof. By integrable_Krep, analyticOnNhd_fourier_Krep, fourierL2_toLp_ne_zero_of_ne_zero.
Used by niceWedgeCyclic_bumpW.