Spectral · section of the QIQT-H book
QIQTH.Spectral.SpectralTheorem
← all sections · ← PVM · StandardSubspaceModular →
Spectral · entries 670–752 of 1000
Lemma 670 (congr_simp). source ↗
s=s_1→∀(zz_1:H),z=z_1→qThasz=qThas_1z_1
Proof. Immediate from the definitions. □
Used by qForm_neg, bForm_zero_right.
Lemma 671 (congr_simp). source ↗
s=s_1→∀(uu_1:H),u=u_1→∀(vv_1:H),v=v_1→bThasuv=bThas_1u_1v_1
Proof. Immediate from the definitions. □
Used by bForm_neg_right.
Lemma 672 (congr_simp). source ↗
s=s_1→EThas=EThas_1
Proof. Immediate from the definitions. □
Used by specProj_finset_sum.
Lemma 673 (congr_simp). source ↗
x=x_1→μspThax=μspThax_1
Proof. Immediate from the definitions. □
Used by specMeasure_zero.
Definition 674 (specFunctional). source ↗
The scalar spectral functional as an ℝ-linear map on compactly-supported continuous functions on the spectrum: f ↦ re ⟪x, f(T) x⟫, where f(T) := cfcHom ha f.
specFunctionalHTx:={toFun:=λf↦re(⟨x,((cfcHomha)f.toContinuousMap)x⟩),map_add′:=⋯,map_smul′:=⋯}
Used by specPLM.
Definition 675 (specPLM). source ↗
The scalar spectral functional bundled as a positive linear functional Λ_x : C_c(spectrum ℝ T, ℝ) →ₚ[ℝ] ℝ.
Used by specMeasure, integral_specMeasure, instIsFiniteMeasureElemRealSpectrumContinuousLinearMapComplexIdSpecMeasure.
Definition 676 (specMeasure). source ↗
The scalar spectral measure μ_x of a self-adjoint T at a vector x: the Riesz–Markov measure of the positive functional Λ_x = specPLM.
μspHTx:=rieszMeasure(specPLMThax)
Used by congr_simp, integral_specMeasure, instIsFiniteMeasureElemRealSpectrumContinuousLinearMapComplexIdSpecMeasure, specMeasure_real_univ, specMeasure_real_le, specMeasure_smul, specMeasure_parallelogram, specMeasure_add, and 22 more.
Lemma 677 (integral_specMeasure). source ↗
Defining property of the scalar spectral measure (Riesz–Markov representation): ∫ f dμ_x = re ⟪x, f(T) x⟫ for every f ∈ C_c(spectrum ℝ T, ℝ).
∫(s:(spRT)),fs∂μspThax=re(⟨x,((cfcHomha)f.toContinuousMap)x⟩)
Proof. By specPLM. □
Used by specMeasure_real_univ, specMeasure_smul, specMeasure_parallelogram, specMeasure_add, integral_specMeasure_cont, re_inner_T_eq_integral.
Lemma 678 (instIsFiniteMeasureElemRealSpectrumContinuousLinearMapComplexIdSpecMeasure). source ↗
μ_x is a finite measure (the spectrum is compact).
IsFiniteMeasure(μspThax)
Proof. By specPLM. □
Used by specMeasure_real_le, specMeasure_smul, specMeasure_parallelogram, specMeasure_add, qForm_parallelogram, qForm_add, qForm_union, specProj_hasSum, and 6 more.
Lemma 679 (specMeasure_real_univ). source ↗
Total mass of the scalar spectral measure — the scalar-level E(univ) = 1: μ_x(univ) = ‖x‖² (as a real number), since 1(T) = 1 and re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖².
(μspThax).real=∥x∥2
Proof. By integral_specMeasure. □
Used by specMeasure_real_le, qForm_univ.
Lemma 680 (specMeasure_real_le). source ↗
Per-set bound for the scalar spectral measure: μ_z(B) ≤ ‖z‖² for every set B (monotonicity against the total mass μ_z(univ) = ‖z‖²). This feeds the operator-norm bound on the spectral projections E(B).
(μspThaz).realB≤∥z∥2
Proof. By instIsFiniteMeasureElemRealSpectrumContinuousLinearMapComplexIdSpecMeasure, specMeasure_real_univ. □
Used by bForm_abs_le, specProj_le_one.
Lemma 681 (specMeasure_smul). source ↗
Scaling law of the scalar spectral measure: μ_{c•x} = ‖c‖² · μ_x.
μspTha(c⋅x)=∥c∥+2⋅μspThax
Proof. By integral_specMeasure, instIsFiniteMeasureElemRealSpectrumContinuousLinearMapComplexIdSpecMeasure. □
Used by specMeasure_zero, qForm_smul.
Lemma 682 (specMeasure_parallelogram). source ↗
Parallelogram law of the scalar spectral measure: μ_{x+y} + μ_{x−y} = 2·μ_x + 2·μ_y (the cross terms of the quadratic form cancel). Holds for any operator; the engine for sesquilinearity of the polarized form.
μspTha(x+y)+μspTha(x−y)=2⋅μspThax+2⋅μspThay
Proof. By integral_specMeasure, instIsFiniteMeasureElemRealSpectrumContinuousLinearMapComplexIdSpecMeasure. □
Used by qForm_parallelogram.
Lemma 683 (specMeasure_add). source ↗
Additivity engine (measure level): the second-difference identity μ_{x+a+b} + μ_{x−a} + μ_{x−b} = μ_{x−a−b} + μ_{x+a} + μ_{x+b} (both sides expand to 3q(x)+2q(a)+2q(b)+g(a,b) for the quadratic form q and its symmetric bilinear part g). Applied with (a,b)=(y₁,y₂) and (a,b)=(I·y₁, I·y₂) it yields additivity of the polarized spectral form in y.
μspTha(x+a+b)+μspTha(x−a)+μspTha(x−b)=μspTha(x−a−b)+μspTha(x+a)+μspTha(x+b)
Proof. By integral_specMeasure, instIsFiniteMeasureElemRealSpectrumContinuousLinearMapComplexIdSpecMeasure. □
Used by qForm_add.
Definition 684 (qForm). source ↗
The diagonal quadratic form q_s(z) = μ_z(s) (real, nonnegative).
qHTsz:=(μspThaz).reals
Used by congr_simp, qForm_nonneg, qForm_zero, qForm_smul, qForm_neg, qForm_parallelogram, qForm_add, bForm, and 23 more.
Lemma 685 (qForm_nonneg). source ↗
0≤qThasz
Proof. By specMeasure. □
Used by bForm_sq_le, bForm_abs_le, specProj_isPositive.
Lemma 686 (specMeasure_zero). source ↗
μ_0 = 0 (the zero vector gives the zero measure).
μspTha0=0
Proof. By congr_simp, specMeasure_smul. □
Used by qForm_zero.
Lemma 687 (qForm_zero). source ↗
qThas0=0
Proof. By specMeasure, specMeasure_zero. □
Used by bForm_self.
Lemma 688 (qForm_smul). source ↗
qThas(c⋅z)=∥c∥2⋅qThasz
Proof. By specMeasure, specMeasure_smul. □
Used by qForm_neg, bForm_self, qForm_real_smul, bForm_I_smul.
Lemma 689 (qForm_neg). source ↗
qThas(−z)=qThasz
Proof. By congr_simp, qForm_smul. □
Used by bForm_comm.
Lemma 690 (qForm_parallelogram). source ↗
qThas(x+y)+qThas(x−y)=2⋅qThasx+2⋅qThasy
Proof. By specMeasure, instIsFiniteMeasureElemRealSpectrumContinuousLinearMapComplexIdSpecMeasure, specMeasure_parallelogram. □
Used by qForm_add_expand.
Lemma 691 (qForm_add). source ↗
qThas(x+a+b)+qThas(x−a)+qThas(x−b)=qThas(x−a−b)+qThas(x+a)+qThas(x+b)
Proof. By specMeasure, instIsFiniteMeasureElemRealSpectrumContinuousLinearMapComplexIdSpecMeasure, specMeasure_add. □
Used by bForm_add_right.
Definition 692 (bForm). source ↗
The polarized bilinear form b_s(u,v) = ¼(q_s(u+v) − q_s(u−v)).
bHTsuv:=(qThas(u+v)−qThas(u−v))/4
Used by congr_simp, qForm_add_expand, bForm_self, bForm_comm, bForm_add_right, bForm_zero_right, bFormRight, bForm_sq_le, and 22 more.
Lemma 693 (qForm_add_expand). source ↗
Expansion identity: q_s(p+q) = q_s(p) + q_s(q) + 2 b_s(p,q) (from the parallelogram law).
qThas(p+q)=qThasp+qThasq+2⋅bThaspq
Proof. By qForm_parallelogram. □
Used by bForm_sq_le.
Lemma 694 (bForm_self). source ↗
b_s(u,u) = q_s(u).
bThasuu=qThasu
Proof. By qForm_zero, qForm_smul. □
Used by reApplyInnerSelf_specProj.
Lemma 695 (bForm_comm). source ↗
b_s is symmetric.
bThasuv=bThasvu
Proof. By qForm, qForm_neg. □
Used by cForm_hermitian, bForm_sub_left.
Lemma 696 (bForm_add_right). source ↗
b_s is additive in its right argument.
bThasu(v+w)=bThasuv+bThasuw
Proof. By qForm, qForm_add. □
Used by bFormRight, bForm_sub_right, cForm_add_right.
Lemma 697 (qForm_real_smul). source ↗
Real-scalar version of the scaling law: q_s(r•z) = r²·q_s(z).
qThas(r⋅z)=r2⋅qThasz
Proof. By qForm_smul. □
Used by bForm_sq_le.
Lemma 698 (bForm_zero_right). source ↗
bThasu0=0
Proof. By congr_simp, qForm. □
Used by bFormRight.
Definition 699 (bFormRight). source ↗
b_s(u, ·) bundled as an additive homomorphism (used for ℚ-homogeneity in Cauchy–Schwarz).
bFormRightHTsu:={toFun:=λw↦bThasuw,map_zero′:=⋯,map_add′:=⋯}
Used by bForm_sq_le, bForm_real_smul_right.
Lemma 700 (bForm_sq_le). source ↗
Cauchy–Schwarz for the spectral form: b_s(u,v)² ≤ q_s(u)·q_s(v). Because q_s ≥ 0, the quadratic t ↦ q_s(u + t•v) = q_s(v)·t² + 2 b_s(u,v)·t + q_s(u) is nonnegative on ℚ (hence on ℝ by density), so its discriminant is ≤ 0.
bThasuv2≤qThasu⋅qThasv
Proof. By qForm_nonneg, qForm_add_expand, qForm_real_smul, bFormRight. □
Used by bForm_abs_le.
Lemma 701 (bForm_sub_right). source ↗
b_s is subtractive in its right argument.
bThasu(v−w)=bThasuv−bThasuw
Proof. By bForm_add_right. □
Used by bForm_continuous_right, bForm_sub_left.
Lemma 702 (bForm_abs_le). source ↗
Boundedness of the spectral form: |b_s(u,v)| ≤ ‖u‖·‖v‖ (from Cauchy–Schwarz and q_s(z) ≤ ‖z‖²).
∣bThasuv∣≤∥u∥⋅∥v∥
Proof. By specMeasure_real_le, qForm, qForm_nonneg, bForm_sq_le. □
Used by bForm_continuous_right, cForm_norm_le.
Lemma 703 (bForm_continuous_right). source ↗
b_s(u, ·) is continuous (Lipschitz with constant ‖u‖).
Continuousλv↦bThasuv
Proof. By bForm_sub_right, bForm_abs_le. □
Used by bForm_real_smul_right.
Lemma 704 (bForm_real_smul_right). source ↗
ℝ-homogeneity of b_s(u, ·) (continuity + map_real_smul).
bThasu(r⋅v)=r⋅bThasuv
Proof. By bFormRight, bForm_continuous_right. □
Used by bForm_neg_right.
Lemma 705 (bForm_neg_right). source ↗
bThasu(−v)=−bThasuv
Proof. By congr_simp, bForm_real_smul_right. □
Used by bForm_I_comm.
Lemma 706 (bForm_I_smul). source ↗
b_s is invariant under simultaneous multiplication by i: b_s(I•u, I•v) = b_s(u,v) (from the i-invariance q_s(I•z) = q_s(z)).
bThas(i⋅u)(i⋅v)=bThasuv
Proof. By qForm, qForm_smul. □
Used by bForm_I_comm.
Lemma 707 (bForm_I_comm). source ↗
The i-twist: b_s(I•x, y) = − b_s(x, I•y).
bThas(i⋅x)y=−bThasx(i⋅y)
Proof. By bForm_neg_right, bForm_I_smul. □
Used by cForm_hermitian.
Definition 708 (cForm). source ↗
The complex spectral form c_s(x,y) = b_s(x,y) − i·b_s(x, I•y); its Riesz representation will be the spectral projection E(s), with ⟪E(s) x, y⟫ = c_s(x,y).
cHTsxy:=(bThasxy)−i⋅(bThasx(i⋅y))
Used by cForm_add_right, cForm_norm_le, cFormCLM, cFormCLM_norm_le, inner_specProj, cForm_empty, specProj_empty, cForm_hermitian, and 8 more.
Lemma 709 (cForm_add_right). source ↗
cThasx(y+z)=cThasxy+cThasxz
Proof. By bForm, bForm_add_right. □
Used by cFormCLM, cFormCLM_norm_le.
Lemma 710 (cForm_norm_le). source ↗
Norm bound: ‖c_s(x,y)‖ ≤ 2·‖x‖·‖y‖.
∥cThasxy∥≤2⋅∥x∥⋅∥y∥
Proof. By bForm, bForm_abs_le. □
Used by cFormCLM, cFormCLM_norm_le.
Definition 711 (cFormCLM). source ↗
c_s(x, ·) bundled as a continuous ℂ-linear functional H →L[ℂ] ℂ.
cFormCLMHTsx:={toFun:=λy↦cThasxy,map_add′:=⋯,map_smul′:=⋯}.mkContinuous(2⋅∥x∥)⋯
Used by cFormCLM_norm_le, specProj, inner_specProj.
Lemma 712 (cFormCLM_norm_le). source ↗
∥cFormCLMThasx∥≤2⋅∥x∥
Proof. By cForm, cForm_add_right, cForm_norm_le. □
Used by specProj, inner_specProj.
Definition 713 (specProj). source ↗
The spectral projection E(s) : H →L[ℂ] H, obtained by Riesz-representing the bounded sesquilinear form c_s (⟪E(s) x, y⟫ = c_s(x,y)).
EHTs:=continuousLinearMapOfBilin({toFun:=λx↦cFormCLMThasx,map_add′:=⋯,map_smul′:=⋯}.mkContinuous2⋯)
Used by congr_simp, inner_specProj, specProj_empty, specProj_isSelfAdjoint, specProj_univ, reApplyInnerSelf_specProj, specProj_isPositive, specProj_union_disjoint, and 10 more.
Lemma 714 (inner_specProj). source ↗
Defining identity of the spectral projection: ⟪E(s) x, y⟫ = c_s(x,y).
⟨(EThas)x,y⟩=cThasxy
Proof. By cFormCLM, cFormCLM_norm_le. □
Used by specProj_empty, specProj_isSelfAdjoint, specProj_univ, reApplyInnerSelf_specProj, specProj_union_disjoint, re_inner_cfcHom_specProj, specProj_inter.
Lemma 715 (cForm_empty). source ↗
c_∅ = 0.
cTha∅xy=0
Proof. By specMeasure, qForm, bForm. □
Used by specProj_empty.
Lemma 716 (specProj_empty). source ↗
E(∅) = 0.
ETha∅=0
Proof. By cForm, inner_specProj, cForm_empty. □
Used by specProj_finset_sum, PVM_of_selfAdjoint.
Lemma 717 (cForm_hermitian). source ↗
Hermitian symmetry of the form: conj(c_s(y,x)) = c_s(x,y).
(starRingEndC)(cThasyx)=cThasxy
Proof. By bForm, bForm_comm, bForm_I_comm. □
Used by specProj_isSelfAdjoint.
Lemma 718 (specProj_isSelfAdjoint). source ↗
E(s) is self-adjoint.
IsSelfAdjoint(EThas)
Proof. By cForm, inner_specProj, cForm_hermitian. □
Used by specProj_isPositive, specProj_le_one, norm_specProj_sq_le, re_inner_cfcHom_specProj, specProj_inter, PVM_of_selfAdjoint, scalarMeasure_eq_specMeasure.
Lemma 719 (qForm_univ). source ↗
q_univ(z) = ‖z‖².
qThaz=∥z∥2
Proof. By specMeasure_real_univ. □
Used by bForm_univ.
Lemma 720 (bForm_univ). source ↗
b_univ(x,y) = re ⟪x,y⟫ (polarization of the norm).
bThaxy=re(⟨x,y⟩)
Proof. By qForm, qForm_univ. □
Used by cForm_univ.
Lemma 721 (cForm_univ). source ↗
c_univ(x,y) = ⟪x,y⟫.
cThaxy=⟨x,y⟩
Proof. By bForm, bForm_univ. □
Used by specProj_univ.
Lemma 722 (specProj_univ). source ↗
E(univ) = 1.
ETha=1
Proof. By cForm, inner_specProj, cForm_univ. □
Used by PVM_of_selfAdjoint.
Lemma 723 (reApplyInnerSelf_specProj). source ↗
The diagonal of the spectral form is the (real, nonnegative) quadratic form: re ⟪E(s) x, x⟫ = q_s(x).
(EThas).reApplyInnerSelfx=qThasx
Proof. By bForm, bForm_self, cForm, inner_specProj. □
Used by specProj_isPositive, specProj_le_one, norm_specProj_sq_le, scalarMeasure_eq_specMeasure.
Lemma 724 (specProj_isPositive). source ↗
E(s) is a positive operator.
(EThas).IsPositive
Proof. By qForm, qForm_nonneg, specProj_isSelfAdjoint, reApplyInnerSelf_specProj. □
Used by norm_specProj_sq_le.
Lemma 725 (qForm_union). source ↗
Finite additivity of the diagonal form on disjoint sets.
Disjointst→MeasurableSett→∀(z:H),qTha(s∪t)z=qThasz+qThatz
Proof. By specMeasure, instIsFiniteMeasureElemRealSpectrumContinuousLinearMapComplexIdSpecMeasure. □
Used by cForm_union_disjoint.
Lemma 726 (cForm_union_disjoint). source ↗
Finite additivity of the complex form on disjoint sets.
Disjointst→MeasurableSett→∀(xy:H),cTha(s∪t)xy=cThasxy+cThatxy
Proof. By qForm, bForm, qForm_union. □
Used by specProj_union_disjoint.
Lemma 727 (specProj_union_disjoint). source ↗
Finite additivity of the spectral projection on disjoint measurable sets: E(s ∪ t) = E(s) + E(t).
Disjointst→MeasurableSett→ETha(s∪t)=EThas+EThat
Proof. By cForm, inner_specProj, cForm_union_disjoint. □
Used by specProj_finset_sum, specProj_hasSum.
Lemma 728 (specProj_le_one). source ↗
E(s) ≤ 1 (the spectral projection is a contraction in the Loewner order): 1 − E(s) is positive since re ⟪(1−E(s)) x, x⟫ = ‖x‖² − q_s(x) ≥ 0.
EThas≤1
Proof. By specMeasure_real_le, qForm, specProj_isSelfAdjoint, reApplyInnerSelf_specProj. □
Used by norm_specProj_sq_le.
Lemma 729 (norm_specProj_sq_le). source ↗
Effect estimate: for the positive contraction E(s), ‖E(s) x‖² ≤ q_s(x). (From E(s)² ≤ E(s), i.e. E(s)·(1−E(s)) ≥ 0 for commuting positives.)
∥(EThas)x∥2≤qThasx
Proof. By specProj_isSelfAdjoint, reApplyInnerSelf_specProj, specProj_isPositive, specProj_le_one. □
Used by specProj_hasSum.
Lemma 730 (specProj_finset_sum). source ↗
Finite (Finset) additivity of the spectral projection over pairwise-disjoint measurable sets: ∑ n ∈ F, E(A n) = E(⋃ n ∈ F, A n).
(∀(n:N),MeasurableSet(An))→(Pairwiseλmn↦Disjoint(Am)(An))→∀(F:FinsetN),nF∑ETha(An)=ETha(⋃n∈F,An)
Proof. By congr_simp, specProj_empty, specProj_union_disjoint. □
Used by specProj_hasSum.
Lemma 731 (specProj_hasSum). source ↗
σ-additivity of the spectral projection (strong/SOT): for pairwise-disjoint measurable A, HasSum (fun n => E(A n) x) (E(⋃ n, A n) x). Proved by a norm-tail estimate: ‖∑_{n∈s} E(A n) x − E(⋃A) x‖² ≤ q_{(⋃A)∖(⋃_s)}(x) = q_{⋃A}(x) − ∑_{n∈s} q_{A n}(x) → 0 (effect estimate + scalar measure σ-additivity).
(∀(n:N),MeasurableSet(An))→(Pairwiseλmn↦Disjoint(Am)(An))→∀(x:H),HasSum(λn↦(ETha(An))x)((ETha(⋃n,An))x)
Proof. By specMeasure, instIsFiniteMeasureElemRealSpectrumContinuousLinearMapComplexIdSpecMeasure, qForm, specProj_union_disjoint, norm_specProj_sq_le, specProj_finset_sum. □
Used by PVM_of_selfAdjoint.
Lemma 732 (inner_cfcHom_mul). source ↗
cfcHom-multiplicativity in the inner product: ⟪g(T)x, h(T)y⟫ = ⟪x, (g·h)(T)y⟫ (self-adjointness of g(T) + cfcHom is an algebra hom). This is the clean engine for the off-diagonal measure identity ν_{g(T)x,y} = g·ν_{x,y} that yields E_inter directly.
⟨((cfcHomha)g)x,((cfcHomha)h)y⟩=⟨x,((cfcHomha)(g⋅h))y⟩
Proof. Immediate from the definitions. □
Used by specMeasure_engine.
Lemma 733 (integral_specMeasure_cont). source ↗
Bridge: the scalar-measure integral of a continuous h is re ⟪z, h(T) z⟫ (the C_c version integral_specMeasure specialised via HasCompactSupport.of_compactSpace).
∫(ω:(spRT)),hω∂μspThaz=re(⟨z,((cfcHomha)h)z⟩)
Proof. By integral_specMeasure. □
Used by specMeasure_engine, integral_specMeasure_polarization.
Lemma 734 (specMeasure_engine). source ↗
Off-diagonal engine (integral form): for continuous g, h and any vectors x, v, (∫h dμ_{g(T)x+v} − ∫h dμ_{g(T)x−v}) = (∫(h·g) dμ_{x+v} − ∫(h·g) dμ_{x−v}). Both sides equal 4·re⟪x, (h·g)(T) v⟫ (polarization + inner_cfcHom_mul).
∫(ω:(spRT)),hω∂μspTha(((cfcHomha)g)x+v)−∫(ω:(spRT)),hω∂μspTha(((cfcHomha)g)x−v)=∫(ω:(spRT)),(h⋅g)ω∂μspTha(x+v)−∫(ω:(spRT)),(h⋅g)ω∂μspTha(x−v)
Proof. By inner_cfcHom_mul, integral_specMeasure_cont. □
Used by specMeasure_engine_measure.
Lemma 735 (specMeasure_engine_measure). source ↗
Engine, measure form (g ≥ 0): μ_{g(T)x+v} + (μ_{x−v}·g) = μ_{g(T)x−v} + (μ_{x+v}·g), where ·g is withDensity (ENNReal.ofReal ∘ g). Lifts specMeasure_engine to a measure identity by Riesz–Markov uniqueness.
(∀(ω:(spRT)),0≤gω)→∀(xv:H),(μspTha(((cfcHomha)g)x+v)+(μspTha(x−v)).wdλω↦gω)=μspTha(((cfcHomha)g)x−v)+(μspTha(x+v)).wdλω↦gω
Proof. By instIsFiniteMeasureElemRealSpectrumContinuousLinearMapComplexIdSpecMeasure, specMeasure_engine. □
Used by specMeasure_setEngine_nonneg.
Lemma 736 (withDensity_real_setIntegral). source ↗
withDensity-to-setIntegral bridge: ((μ_z)·g).real s = ∫_s g dμ_z for g ≥ 0.
(∀(ω:(spRT)),0≤gω)→∀(z:H){s:Set(spRT)},MeasurableSets→((μspThaz).wdλω↦gω).reals=∫(ω:(spRT))ins,gω∂μspThaz
Proof. Immediate from the definitions. □
Used by specMeasure_setEngine_nonneg.
Lemma 737 (specMeasure_setEngine_nonneg). source ↗
Set-level engine for g ≥ 0: q_s(g(T)x+v) − q_s(g(T)x−v) = ∫_s g dμ_{x+v} − ∫_s g dμ_{x−v} (the .real-at-s evaluation of specMeasure_engine_measure).
(∀(ω:(spRT)),0≤gω)→∀(xv:H){s:Set(spRT)},MeasurableSets→(μspTha(((cfcHomha)g)x+v)).reals−(μspTha(((cfcHomha)g)x−v)).reals=∫(ω:(spRT))ins,gω∂μspTha(x+v)−∫(ω:(spRT))ins,gω∂μspTha(x−v)
Proof. By instIsFiniteMeasureElemRealSpectrumContinuousLinearMapComplexIdSpecMeasure, specMeasure_engine_measure, withDensity_real_setIntegral. □
Used by specMeasure_setEngine.
Lemma 738 (bForm_sub_left). source ↗
b_s is subtractive in its left argument.
bThas(u−w)v=bThasuv−bThaswv
Proof. By bForm_comm, bForm_sub_right. □
Used by specMeasure_setEngine.
Lemma 739 (specMeasure_setEngine). source ↗
Set-level engine (general continuous g): q_s(g(T)x+v) − q_s(g(T)x−v) = ∫_s g dμ_{x+v} − ∫_s g dμ_{x−v}. Both sides are linear in g; extend the g≥0 case by g = (g+‖g‖) − ‖g‖.
MeasurableSets→(μspTha(((cfcHomha)g)x+v)).reals−(μspTha(((cfcHomha)g)x−v)).reals=∫(ω:(spRT))ins,gω∂μspTha(x+v)−∫(ω:(spRT))ins,gω∂μspTha(x−v)
Proof. By instIsFiniteMeasureElemRealSpectrumContinuousLinearMapComplexIdSpecMeasure, qForm, bForm, specMeasure_setEngine_nonneg, bForm_sub_left. □
Used by specProj_engine_measure.
Lemma 740 (re_inner_cfcHom_specProj). source ↗
Diagonal–E(s) identity: re ⟪x, h(T)(E(s)v)⟫ = b_s(h(T)x, v) for continuous h. (Move h(T) and E(s) across by self-adjointness; the imaginary part of c_s drops under re.)
re(⟨x,((cfcHomha)h)((EThas)v)⟩)=bThas(((cfcHomha)h)x)v
Proof. By cForm, inner_specProj, specProj_isSelfAdjoint. □
Used by specProj_engine_measure.
Lemma 741 (integral_specMeasure_polarization). source ↗
Polarization at the scalar-measure level: ∫f dμ_{w+u} − ∫f dμ_{w−u} = 4·re⟪w, f(T)u⟫.
∫(ω:(spRT)),fω∂μspTha(w+u)−∫(ω:(spRT)),fω∂μspTha(w−u)=4⋅re(⟨w,((cfcHomha)f)u⟩)
Proof. By integral_specMeasure_cont. □
Used by specProj_engine_measure.
Lemma 742 (specProj_engine_measure). source ↗
Final measure identity: μ_{x+E(s)v} + (μ_{x−v})↾s = μ_{x−E(s)v} + (μ_{x+v})↾s. Proved by Riesz–Markov uniqueness: the test against continuous f reduces, via the polarization + re_inner_cfcHom_specProj + specMeasure_setEngine, to an identity that holds.
MeasurableSets→∀(xv:H),μspTha(x+(EThas)v)+(μspTha(x−v)).restrs=μspTha(x−(EThas)v)+(μspTha(x+v)).restrs
Proof. By instIsFiniteMeasureElemRealSpectrumContinuousLinearMapComplexIdSpecMeasure, qForm, bForm, specMeasure_setEngine, re_inner_cfcHom_specProj, integral_specMeasure_polarization. □
Used by bForm_specProj.
Lemma 743 (bForm_specProj). source ↗
The intersection identity at the form level: b_t(x, E(s)v) = b_{s∩t}(x, v) (evaluate specProj_engine_measure at t via .real).
MeasurableSets→MeasurableSett→∀(xv:H),bThatx((EThas)v)=bTha(s∩t)xv
Proof. By specMeasure, instIsFiniteMeasureElemRealSpectrumContinuousLinearMapComplexIdSpecMeasure, qForm, specProj_engine_measure. □
Used by specProj_inter.
Lemma 744 (specProj_inter). source ↗
E_inter: E(s∩t) = E(s)·E(t) — the projection / multiplicativity property, the final ProjectionValuedMeasure field. E(s)·E(t) tested against ⟪·x,y⟫ is c_t(x,E(s)y), which equals c_{s∩t}(x,y) by bForm_specProj (using E(s) ℂ-linear for the imaginary part).
MeasurableSets→MeasurableSett→ETha(s∩t)=EThas⋅EThat
Proof. By bForm, cForm, inner_specProj, specProj_isSelfAdjoint, bForm_specProj. □
Used by PVM_of_selfAdjoint, scalarMeasure_eq_specMeasure.
Definition 745 (PVM_of_selfAdjoint). source ↗
The bounded spectral theorem (PVM form): every bounded self-adjoint T : H →L[ℂ] H induces a projection-valued measure on spectrum ℝ T, with E(s) = specProj. All structure fields are the lemmas proved above; isIdem is E_inter at s = t.
PVM_of_selfAdjointHT:={E:=ETha,isSA:=⋯,isIdem:=⋯,E_empty:=⋯,E_univ:=⋯,E_inter:=⋯,hasSum_iUnion:=⋯}
Used by rvdSpecMeasure, deviceOpC_norm_le, borelFC_inner_self, rvdSpec_borelFC_diag, rvdSpecMeasure_zero_levelSet, rvdSpecMeasure_two_levelSet, tendsto_integral_devChar_remainder_sq, tendsto_integral_devChar_diff_sq, and 17 more.
Lemma 746 (re_inner_T_eq_integral). source ↗
Spectral representation of T (diagonal form): ∫_{σ(T)} λ dμ_x(λ) = re ⟪x, T x⟫. Since μ_x is the scalar spectral measure of the PVM_of_selfAdjoint (μ_x(s) = ⟪E(s)x,x⟫), this is the statement T = ∫ λ dE(λ) tested on the diagonal — T recovered from its PVM.
∫(ω:(spRT)),ω∂μspThax=re(⟨x,Tx⟩)
Proof. By integral_specMeasure. □
Used by diagInt_specCoord.
Definition 747 (borelFC). source ↗
The bounded Borel functional calculus of a bounded self-adjoint T: f(T) for bounded measurable f : σ(T) → ℂ.
ΦBHTfC:=(PVM_of_selfAdjointTha).ΦhfhC0hC
Used by borelFC_congr_ae, deviceOpC_neg_half_eq, deviceOpReal, deviceOpC, deviceOpC_norm_le, deviceOpReal_zero, deviceOpReal_eq, borelFC_inner_self, and 36 more.
Lemma 748 (inner_borelFC). source ↗
Defining property: ⟪x, f(T) y⟫ = B_f(x,y) (the polarized scalar-measure form).
⟨x,(ΦBThahfhC0hC)y⟩=(PVM_of_selfAdjointTha).bdfxy
Proof. By inner_boundedFC. □
Used by borelFC_inner_self, rvdSpec_borelFC_diag, borelFC_adjoint, rvdRC_eq_borelFC.
Lemma 749 (borelFC_mul). source ↗
Multiplicativity of the bounded Borel FC: (f·g)(T) = f(T)·g(T).
ΦBThahfphC0phCp=ΦBThahfhC0fhCf⋅ΦBThahghC0ghCg
Proof. By boundedFC_mul, PVM_of_selfAdjoint. □
Used by deviceOpReal_eq, borelFC_inner_self, deviceOpC_bottomEdge_eq, modUnitary_add, borelFC_comm, cfcCont_mul, cfcΩ_hΩ, rvdRC_mul_E_levelSet.
Lemma 750 (borelFC_one). source ↗
The bounded Borel FC is unital: (fun _ => 1)(T) = 1.
ΦBTha⋯⋯⋯=1
Proof. By boundedFC, boundedFC_const, PVM_of_selfAdjoint. □
Used by modUnitary_zero, cfcCont_one.
Lemma 751 (borelFC_const). source ↗
Constant rule (fun _ => c)(T) = c·1 — the QIQTH-layer wrapper of boundedFC_const.
ΦBTha⋯⋯⋯=c⋅1
Proof. By boundedFC_const, PVM_of_selfAdjoint. □
Used by rvdRC_mul_E_levelSet.
Lemma 752 (borelFC_indicator). source ↗
Indicator rule 𝟙_s(T) = E s — the QIQTH-layer wrapper of boundedFC_indicator: the bounded Borel FC of a level-set indicator is the corresponding spectral projection of the PVM.
ΦBTha⋯⋯⋯=(PVM_of_selfAdjointTha).Es
Proof. By boundedFC_indicator. □
Used by rvdRC_mul_E_levelSet.
← all sections · ← PVM · StandardSubspaceModular →