WedgeKMSToGR · section of the QIQT-H book
QIQTH.WedgeKMSToGR
← all sections · ← ValueSelection
WedgeKMSToGR · entries 997–1000 of 1000
Definition 997 (WedgeKMSFlux_complete). source ↗
The wedge KMS property with the genuine, non-vacuous KMS condition. Identical to WedgeKMSFlux except the bundled opaque hUniq (the KMS-uniqueness implication) and the trivially-satisfiable StripKMS are replaced by the single genuine RvD Definition 3.4 predicate StripKMSrvd V 𝒦_W — from which the BW identification modUnitary = boostUnitary is DERIVED (oneParticleBW_wedge_complete, via the RvD Theorem 3.8 discharge oneParticleBW_complete). So the wedge KMS input is now exactly: standardness of the wedge subspace, V = boostUnitary(−2π·), the genuine KMS condition, the boost-charge = stress-flux identity, and the localization identity — with NO assumed uniqueness implication.
Used by qiqt_gr_explicit_kg, hFlux_of_wedgeKMS_complete, qiqt_gr_from_wedge_kms_complete.
Lemma 998 (hFlux_of_wedgeKMS_complete). source ↗
hFlux derived from the genuine wedge KMS property (via component_hFlux_of_wedgeKMS_complete): kd = (2π/ℏ)·T_kk per null generator, with the BW identification machine-checked from StripKMSrvd.
WedgeKMSFlux_completegTkdℏ→∀(x:M4)(v:Fin4→R),(gx)(v,v)=0→K˙(x,v)=2⋅π/ℏ⋅(Tx)(v,v)
Proof. By boostUnitary, wedgeGenSet, StripKMSrvd, component_hFlux_of_wedgeKMS_complete, modUnitary. □
Used by qiqt_gr_from_wedge_kms_complete.
Lemma 999 (qiqt_gr_from_wedge_kms_complete). source ↗
THE GOAL THEOREM, with KMS-uniqueness DERIVED. Einstein’s equations from QIQT-H’s capacity postulate + Klein positivity, modulo the three labelled physics inputs — but now the wedge KMS input is the GENUINE, non-vacuous WedgeKMSFlux_complete (using StripKMSrvd, RvD Def 3.4), with the Bisognano–Wichmann KMS-uniqueness no longer an assumed bundled implication but DERIVED from the machine-checked RvD Theorem 3.8 (oneParticleBW_complete). This is qiqt_gr_from_wedge_kms with its one remaining modular-theory assumption (the old opaque hUniq + vacuous StripKMS) replaced by a theorem.
(∀(y:M4)(ab:Fin4),gab(y)=gba(y))→(∀(y:M4)(ab:Fin4),gab(y)=gba(y))→(∀(y:M4)(ab:Fin4),σ∑gaσ(y)⋅gσb(y)=δab)→(∀(ab:Fin4),(λy↦gab(y))∈C∞)→(∀(ab:Fin4),(λy↦gab(y))∈C∞)→∀(T:M4→Fin4→Fin4→R)(ηℏa:R),ℏ=0→η=0→a=2⋅π/(ℏ⋅η)→(∀(x:M4)(a′b:Fin4),Ta′b(x)=Tba′(x))→∀(PPinv:M4→Fin4→Fin4→R),(∀(x:M4)(ij:Fin4),k∑Pik(x)⋅(P−1)kj(x)=δij)→(∀(x:M4)(ij:Fin4),k∑(P−1)ik(x)⋅Pkj(x)=δij)→(∀(x:M4)(ij:Fin4),gij(x)=k∑l∑Pki(x)⋅ηkl⋅Plj(x))→∀(SfKEA:M4→(Fin4→R)→R→R)(sdkdad:M4→(Fin4→R)→R),(∀(x:M4)(v:Fin4→R),(gx)(v,v)=0→(Sfxv)′(0)=S˙(x,v))→(∀(x:M4)(v:Fin4→R),(gx)(v,v)=0→(KExv)′(0)=K˙(x,v))→(∀(x:M4)(v:Fin4→R),(gx)(v,v)=0→(Axv)′(0)=A˙(x,v))→(∀(x:M4)(v:Fin4→R),(gx)(v,v)=0→for t near 0,Sfxvt≤η⋅A(x,v,t))→(∀(x:M4)(v:Fin4→R),(gx)(v,v)=0→Sfxv0=η⋅A(x,v,0))→(∀(x:M4)(v:Fin4→R),(gx)(v,v)=0→∀(t:R),0≤KE(x,v,t)−Sfxvt)→(∀(x:M4)(v:Fin4→R),(gx)(v,v)=0→KE(x,v,0)−Sfxv0=0)→WedgeKMSFlux_completegTkdℏ→(∀(x:M4)(v:Fin4→R),(gx)(v,v)=0→A˙(x,v)=(λij↦Rij(x))(v,v))→(∀(f:M4→R),(∀(y:M4)(a′b:Fin4),a⋅Ta′b(y)=Ra′b(y)+fy⋅ga′b(y))→(∀(x:M4)(ρ:Fin4),PdiffAtfρx)∧DifferentiableRλy↦fy+1/2⋅R(y))→(∀(x:M4)(ν:Fin4),(∇⋅λya′b↦a⋅Ta′b(y))ν(x)=0)→∃Λ,∀(x:M4)(μν:Fin4),a⋅Tμν(x)=Gμν(x)+Λ⋅gμν(x)
Proof. By qiqt_bekenstein_gives_gr, hFlux_of_wedgeKMS_complete. □
Used by qiqt_gr_explicit_kg.
Theorem 1000 (qiqt_gr_from_flux_complete). source ↗
THE GOAL THEOREM, taking the per-generator flux EQUATION directly. Identical to qiqt_gr_from_wedge_kms_complete, but the modular input is the bare conclusion hflux : kd x v = (2π/ℏ)·BL(T x)v per null generator — exactly what qiqt_bekenstein_gives_gr consumes — instead of the WedgeKMSFlux_complete (−2π/wedgeGenSet) bundle. This is the convention-agnostic GR entry point: the bundle supplies hflux via hFlux_of_wedgeKMS_complete, and the free-field +2π route supplies it via freeField_component_hFlux — both land here. Axiom-free, no sorry.
(∀(y:M4)(ab:Fin4),gab(y)=gba(y))→(∀(y:M4)(ab:Fin4),gab(y)=gba(y))→(∀(y:M4)(ab:Fin4),σ∑gaσ(y)⋅gσb(y)=δab)→(∀(ab:Fin4),(λy↦gab(y))∈C∞)→(∀(ab:Fin4),(λy↦gab(y))∈C∞)→∀(T:M4→Fin4→Fin4→R)(ηℏa:R),ℏ=0→η=0→a=2⋅π/(ℏ⋅η)→(∀(x:M4)(a′b:Fin4),Ta′b(x)=Tba′(x))→∀(PPinv:M4→Fin4→Fin4→R),(∀(x:M4)(ij:Fin4),k∑Pik(x)⋅(P−1)kj(x)=δij)→(∀(x:M4)(ij:Fin4),k∑(P−1)ik(x)⋅Pkj(x)=δij)→(∀(x:M4)(ij:Fin4),gij(x)=k∑l∑Pki(x)⋅ηkl⋅Plj(x))→∀(SfKEA:M4→(Fin4→R)→R→R)(sdkdad:M4→(Fin4→R)→R),(∀(x:M4)(v:Fin4→R),(gx)(v,v)=0→(Sfxv)′(0)=S˙(x,v))→(∀(x:M4)(v:Fin4→R),(gx)(v,v)=0→(KExv)′(0)=K˙(x,v))→(∀(x:M4)(v:Fin4→R),(gx)(v,v)=0→(Axv)′(0)=A˙(x,v))→(∀(x:M4)(v:Fin4→R),(gx)(v,v)=0→for t near 0,Sfxvt≤η⋅A(x,v,t))→(∀(x:M4)(v:Fin4→R),(gx)(v,v)=0→Sfxv0=η⋅A(x,v,0))→(∀(x:M4)(v:Fin4→R),(gx)(v,v)=0→∀(t:R),0≤KE(x,v,t)−Sfxvt)→(∀(x:M4)(v:Fin4→R),(gx)(v,v)=0→KE(x,v,0)−Sfxv0=0)→(∀(x:M4)(v:Fin4→R),(gx)(v,v)=0→K˙(x,v)=2⋅π/ℏ⋅(Tx)(v,v))→(∀(x:M4)(v:Fin4→R),(gx)(v,v)=0→A˙(x,v)=(λij↦Rij(x))(v,v))→(∀(f:M4→R),(∀(y:M4)(a′b:Fin4),a⋅Ta′b(y)=Ra′b(y)+fy⋅ga′b(y))→(∀(x:M4)(ρ:Fin4),PdiffAtfρx)∧DifferentiableRλy↦fy+1/2⋅R(y))→(∀(x:M4)(ν:Fin4),(∇⋅λya′b↦a⋅Ta′b(y))ν(x)=0)→∃Λ,∀(x:M4)(μν:Fin4),a⋅Tμν(x)=Gμν(x)+Λ⋅gμν(x)
Proof. By qiqt_bekenstein_gives_gr. □
Used by qiqt_gr_freefield.
← all sections · ← ValueSelection